Composite Tiles vs. Asphalt Shingles: A Superior Roofing Solution

Asphalt shingles remain one of the most commonly used roofing materials due to their low upfront cost and widespread availability. However, when you compare composite tiles vs. asphalt shingles, it becomes clear that asphalt doesn’t stack up in terms of durability, longevity, and aesthetics.

Why Brava Composite Tiles Outperform Asphalt Shingles

1. Durability That Withstands the Elements

Brava composite roofing tiles—available in Cedar Shake, Slate, and Spanish Barrel styles—are certified with a Class 4 impact rating, the highest level available. They resist hail, wind, rain, ice, and flying debris. In contrast, asphalt shingles are easily cracked, torn, or displaced during storms.

2. Tested for Extreme Wind Resistance

Where asphalt shingles often fail in hurricane-prone regions, Brava tiles are built to last. They are Miami-Dade approved and tested to withstand wind speeds up to 188 MPH with ring shank nails and up to 211 MPH with high-wind screw installations.

3. Moisture & Mold Resistance

Brava tiles don’t absorb water and are naturally resistant to mold and mildew. Asphalt shingles, however, often develop algae and discoloration—especially in shaded or humid areas—lowering curb appeal and potentially reducing resale value.

4. Aesthetic Longevity

While asphalt shingles usually require replacement within 15–20 years, Brava composite roofing retains its color and structure for decades. Backed by a 50-year limited warranty, Brava tiles offer lasting beauty with minimal upkeep.

The Bottom Line: Brava Composite Roofing Is Built to Last

If you’re comparing composite tiles vs. asphalt shingles, Brava clearly offers superior performance, lower long-term maintenance, and unmatched aesthetic appeal. Investing in Brava means peace of mind and a more beautiful, resilient home.